"Graphene-based nanoparticles possess remarkable physiochemical properties, making them promising for diverse applications in biomedicine, agriculture, food, and industrial applications."
***** The abstract goes on: "These nanoparticles have also been used in the fight against COVID-19."
Graphene-based nanoparticles possess remarkable physiochemical properties, making them promising for diverse applications in biomedicine, agriculture, food, and industrial applications. These nanoparticles have also been used in the fight against COVID-19. Human and environmental exposure to graphene-based nanomaterials is increasing at an unprecedented rate. However, there is still a huge knowledge gap regarding its safety in clinical applications. The topic remains controversial; although several routes of degradation exist, the cytotoxicity of graphene-based nanoparticles has been demonstrated. Various factors that can influence the cytotoxicity of graphene-based materials are discussed. This review summarizes the physiochemical properties of graphene-based materials and critically examines the possible effects of graphene-based nanoparticles on the molecular level and adverse health outcomes. While oxidative stress-mediated cell damage has been proposed as a primary cytotoxicity mechanism for graphene-based materials, various in vivo biodistribution and cytotoxicity mechanisms are also highlighted. Therefore, this review of the literature provides an overview of the cytotoxicity of GBMs and raises concerns about their widespread application with potential hazardous consequences on the environment and human health.
You don’t say.
The study author is Matthew Halma and Heidi N du Preez.
Does that first name sound familiar?
Let’s go back one year to a bizarrely cheerful post from Dr. Peter McCullough… the infamous “mRNA Off to a Bad Start but Future May be Brighter” post.
Yes I wrote that up immediately.
Yes it was an utter shit storm.
Matthew Halma, Jessica Rose, and Tess Lawrie.
Dr. Peter McCullough’s Stack here:
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
We all have the tendency to paint issues with a broad brush. That is to see things one way for intellectual simplicity. “All pharmaceuticals are bad” or “I don’t trust any vaccine.” It is even more tempting to take a negative view on all new technology when the product launch in humans fails to a large degree.
These old mental saws could apply to mRNA vaccines. Halma et al have published a scoping review of lipid nanoparticle-mRNA products with fair balance causing the reader to consider future possibilities. The COVID-19 vaccines are known to be unsafe for several reasons: 1) the Wuhan Spike protein damages cells, tissues, organs, and causes blood clotting, 2) the lipid nanoparticles may have toxicity from the PEG or polysorbate 80 or from syncytia formation, 3) the mRNA appears to be resistant to ribonucleases and is not broken down in the body. As some point the mRNA or fragments could interfere with gene function or alter other microRNAs that are managing the human genome.
The Halma paper points out that safe mRNA products are possible. For example, properly designed mRNA coding for normal proteins that are deficient or ones that are sufficiently humanized and not recognized by the body as foreign could indeed become part of the future pharmacopeia. But there is no doubt that the first use of mRNA on a mass, indiscriminate scale has been a disaster with the COVID-19 vaccine campaign.
If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.
At the time, I found it to be an oddly cheery and hopeful spin on mRNA “technology” by Dr. Peter McCullough.
Later I saw that Elon Musk had tweeted much the same at the same juncture.
And…
McCullough’s hopey spin foreshadowed Bret Weinstein waxing profound about the “elegant technology” of mRNA with Tucker Carlson while hand waving at the 17-million dead and of course not mentioning that the 17-m figure comes from Denis Rancourt who also said that we did not have a pandemic.
I wrote up what Bret Weinstein was really telling you here.
See, I’m fluent in bullshit.
Now right here is the point where I’m just going to track this back a bit.
Not all the way, because I’m mid-research on this.
But my gut already knows.
And the Tier Twos are trying to push this Stack to slip up while “promoting” it, so I’m going to use very measured language and leave some data points.
Boutique Stack or no, there ain’t that many still digging into this because that party sure is lively and you get to wear a floppy hat and feel super-duper pretty but really you have lipstick on your teeth and you ain’t pretty.
Here is another study from Halma, along with Tess Lawrie and Paul Marik and Christopher Plothe.
Abstract
In the wake of the COVID-19 crisis, a need has arisen to prevent and treat two related conditions, COVID-19 vaccine injury and long COVID-19, both of which can trace at least part of their aetiology to the spike protein, which can cause harm through several mechanisms. One significant mechanism of harm is vascular, and it is mediated by the spike protein, a common element of the COVID-19 illness, and it is related to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Given the significant number of people experiencing these two related conditions, it is imperative to develop treatment protocols, as well as to consider the diversity of people experiencing long COVID-19 and vaccine injury. This review summarizes the known treatment options for long COVID-19 and vaccine injury, their mechanisms, and their evidentiary basis.
This appears to be the basis for Spike Support, the dilemma that Dr. Jane Ruby discussed here:
And the basis for the Spike Support still relies on the premise that there was a novel coronavirus (“This thing is different!” said Kory), and this novel RESPIRATORY VIRUS had all kinds of effects that persist including vascular harm.
The VIRUS simply must be included with the shots.
The VIRUS simply must be included with the shots.
The VIRUS has a SPIKE PROTEIN.
SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY (AND VASCULAR) SYNDROME
SARVS.
The World Council For Health is going to have to wait for another post.
This is Tess Lawrie’s organization that I can tell.
The study, published this week in the MDPI journal, Microorganisms, cited the vascular harm commonly seen as a result of Covid-19 illness or after receiving a Covid-19 vaccine and the need for therapies for both direct and indirect treatment to counter the effects of the spike protein from Covid-19. The study also discussed a variety of treatments for long Covid and Covid-19 vaccine injury that have shown varying degrees of success, including nutritional support, establishing a healthy microbiome, and using drugs that can inhibit spike protein and neutralize its harmful effects.
The Better Way Conference in Bath England put on by Tess Lawrie of course featured Bret Weinstein, noted expert.
There he be.
There he be again.
"These (graphene-based) nanoparticles have also been used in the fight against COVID-19."
Said Halma.
Here is the study.
https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/NBE.2024.9290059
Somebody smart read this study as I am over my head here.
But I find it odd. Again.
Odd.
That glowing statement in the abstract.
Very much like Dr. Peter’s glowing tightrope straddle or Evergreen Boy’s “elegant technology” framing on mRNA.
Now with zeeee graphene.
Which caused a shit storm at a Freedom Conference and all the usual Tier Two suspects started trying to pump the brakes on discussing graphene in the shots.
This was a major point of contention between Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger at the Sweden Conference last year.
Bigtree and Cole both looked terrified in the above segment.
What’s the big deal, fellows?
Halma and Heidi said that graphene-based nanoparticles had been used in the fight against COVID-19.
"Graphene-based nanoparticles possess remarkable physiochemical properties, making them promising for diverse applications in biomedicine…”
"These nanoparticles have also been used in the fight against COVID-19."
Is it washing over you right about now?
https://ko-fi.com/sagehanaproductions64182
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/sagehanaJ
No comments:
Post a Comment