How the media allowed a single comma to distract from a ruling to stop genocide
The western media takes seriously a 'fierce debate' about a comma because it helps us to avoid confronting a simple truth: The monsters are us
Israel's claim that a single comma exempts it from having to respect the International Court of Justice's order last week to immediately halt its murderous attack on Rafah should be ridiculed. Instead it is being given space to breathe by complicit media like the Guardian.
The paper's diplomatic editor offers an “analysis” that takes seriously claims by Israel and the two judges at the ICJ – one an Israeli – who dissented from the ruling approved by the other 13. They argue the following:
The world is wrong to think that the ICJ has required Israel to halt its Rafah assault and any actions elsewhere in Gaza that are genocidal. Instead, a comma in the text qualifies the ruling to mean the court wants Israel to halt its actions in Rafah and elsewhere only if they are genocidal. Because Israel's actions are not genocidal, the court is not, in fact, asking Israel to halt anything.
That argument is preposterous on its face. It would be a less forceful statement than the one the court issued back in January, when Israel's genocide was far less developed than it is now.
But there's another glaring flaw in the argument's logic that the Guardian somehow overlooks. If the two dissenting judges are really so sure that is what the overwhelming majority meant – that Israel is barred only from carrying out actions if they are already proven to constitute genocide – why on earth did they dissent?
Were this really the case, there could be only one possible interpretation of their decision to dissent: that they favour giving Israel the green light to commit genocide.
This isn't rocket science.
Israel wants to muddy the waters – as it always does – so it can carry on with its genocide. The “fierce and continuing debate" about the comma, as the Guardian characterises it, is being aired so that Israel can continue murdering children in Gaza until the ICJ makes a definitive ruling on the question of genocide in a few years' time. By then, Gaza will be even more of a smouldering ruin than it is already. By then, the Palestinian population will be either dead or have been ethnically cleansed.
Imagine if it were Vladimir Putin's Russia arguing over a comma as a pretext to avoid implementing a clear ruling by the ICJ to halt atrocities in Ukraine. The ignominy the Guardian and the rest of the media would heap on the Russian president would be relentless – and deserved.
So why are Israel's genocide-justifying evasions not treated the same way?
Because, however unwilling we are to face the facts, western establishments, including our state-corporate media, are fully onboard with this genocide. The only concession they are willing to make is to the optics.
Because western elites, like their more openly colonial forebears, are racist towards members of the Global South like the Palestinians.
Because the West's war machine – into which Israel is so tightly integrated – endlessly enriches those elites through "defence" contracts and resource theft.
And because Israel is central to the narrative we imbibe daily that it is we in the so-called West who are the real victims, not the people whose lives are torn apart by our bombs and our globe-spanning financial institutions.
The western media takes seriously the debate about a comma because it helps us to avoid confronting a simple truth: The monsters are us.
All my posts are freely accessible, but my journalism is possible only because of the support of readers. If you liked this article or any of the others, please consider sharing it with friends and making a donation to support my work. You can do so by becoming a paid Substack subscriber, or donate via Paypal or my bank account, or alternatively set up a monthly direct debit mandate with GoCardless. A complete archive of my writings is available on my website. I’m on Twitter and Facebook.
No comments:
Post a Comment