Lancet Study on Covid Vaccine Autopsies Finds 74% Were Caused by Vaccine – Study is Removed Within 24 Hours
A Lancet review of 325 autopsies after Covid vaccination found that 74% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine – but the study was removed within 24 hours.
The paper, a pre-print that was awaiting peer-review, is written by leading cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch and their colleagues at the Wellness Company and was published online on Wednesday on the pre-print site of the prestigious medical journal.
However, less than 24 hours later, the study was removed and a note appeared stating: “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” While the study had not undergone any part of the peer-review process, the note implies it fell foul of “screening criteria”.
The original study abstract can be found in the Internet Archive. It reads (with my emphasis added):
Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.
Methods: We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.
Findings: The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%) and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.
Interpretation: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.
The full study does not appear to have been saved in the Internet Archive, but can be read here.
Without further detail from the Preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the methodology really has. A number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields so it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by the Covid mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the U.S. public health establishment wants to hear.
Dr. Clare Craig, a pathologist and co-Chair of the HART pandemic advisory group, says that in her view the approach taken in the study is sound. She told the Daily Sceptic:
The VAERS system [of vaccine adverse event reporting] is designed to alert to potential harms without necessarily being the best way of measuring the extent of those harms.
Quantifying the impact of deaths can be done by looking at overall mortality rates in a country.
However, this is imperfect as a deficit of deaths would be expected after a period of excess deaths, making the accuracy of any baseline dubious.
An alternative approach of auditing such deaths through autopsy is sound.
There may be a bias [in the study] towards reporting the autopsies of deaths where there was evidence of causation and the likelihood of causation might be exaggerated by that bias. For example, 19 of the 325 deaths were due to vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) but these reports may be overrepresented because of the regulators’ willingness to acknowledge such deaths.
Nevertheless, it is important that attempts are made to quantify the risk of harm and censorship of these attempts, rather than open scientific critique, does nothing to help reassure people.
Dr. Harvey Risch, one of the study’s authors, told the Daily Sceptic he deems it “pure Government-directed censorship, even after the Missouri v. Biden injunction”.
“Meanwhile, my colleagues are studying what they call ‘Long Vax‘, which is vaccine-caused damage. But of course that is a rare, rare, rare outcome, except that they seem not to be having any problem finding such individuals to enroll in their study,” he added.
Studi Lancet tentang Otopsi Vaksin Covid Menemukan 74% Disebabkan oleh Vaksin - Studi Dihapus Dalam 24 Jam
Will Jones
Tinjauan Lancet terhadap 325 otopsi setelah vaksinasi Covid menemukan bahwa 74% kematian disebabkan oleh vaksin - tetapi penelitian tersebut dihapus dalam waktu 24 jam.
Makalah tersebut, pre-print yang sedang menunggu peer-review, ditulis oleh ahli jantung terkemuka Dr. Peter McCullough, ahli epidemiologi Yale Dr. Harvey Risch dan rekan-rekan mereka di Wellness Company dan diterbitkan secara online pada hari Rabu di situs pra-cetak jurnal medis bergengsi.
Namun, kurang dari 24 jam kemudian, penelitian telah dihapus dan sebuah catatan muncul yang menyatakan: "Pracetak ini telah dihapus oleh Pracetak dengan Lancet karena kesimpulan penelitian tidak didukung oleh metodologi studi." Sementara penelitian belum mengalami bagian apa pun dari proses tinjauan sejawat, catatan tersebut menyiratkan bahwa itu melanggar "kriteria penyaringan".
Abstrak studi asli dapat ditemukan di Internet Archive. Itu berbunyi (dengan penekanan saya ditambahkan):
Latar Belakang: Perkembangan pesat dan penyebaran luas vaksin COVID-19, dikombinasikan dengan sejumlah besar laporan kejadian buruk, telah menyebabkan kekhawatiran atas kemungkinan mekanisme cedera termasuk nanopartikel lipid sistemik (LNP) dan distribusi mRNA, kerusakan jaringan terkait protein lonjakan, trombogenisitas, disfungsi sistem kekebalan tubuh, dan karsinogenisitas. Tujuan dari tinjauan sistematis ini adalah untuk menyelidiki kemungkinan hubungan sebab akibat antara pemberian vaksin COVID-19 dan kematian menggunakan otopsi dan analisis post-mortem.
Metode: Kami mencari semua laporan otopsi dan nekropsi yang diterbitkan terkait vaksinasi COVID-19 hingga 18 Mei 2023. Kami awalnya mengidentifikasi 678 studi dan, setelah penyaringan untuk kriteria inklusi kami, termasuk 44 makalah yang berisi 325 kasus otopsi dan satu kasus nekropsi. Tiga dokter secara independen meninjau semua kematian dan menentukan apakah vaksinasi COVID-19 adalah penyebab langsung atau berkontribusi secara signifikan terhadap kematian.
Temuan: Sistem organ yang paling terlibat dalam kematian terkait vaksin COVID-19 adalah sistem kardiovaskular (53%), diikuti oleh sistem hematologi (17%), sistem pernapasan (8%) dan beberapa sistem organ (7%). Tiga atau lebih sistem organ terpengaruh dalam 21 kasus. Waktu rata-rata dari vaksinasi hingga kematian adalah 14,3 hari. Sebagian besar kematian terjadi dalam waktu seminggu dari pemberian vaksin terakhir. Sebanyak 240 kematian (73,9%) diputuskan secara independen secara langsung karena atau secara signifikan dikontribusikan oleh vaksinasi COVID-19.
Interpretasi: Konsistensi yang terlihat di antara kasus-kasus dalam ulasan ini dengan efek samping vaksin COVID-19 yang diketahui, mekanisme mereka dan kematian berlebih terkait, ditambah dengan konfirmasi otopsi dan ajudikasi kematian yang dipimpin dokter, menunjukkan ada kemungkinan besar hubungan sebab akibat antara vaksin COVID-19 dan kematian dalam banyak kasus. Investigasi mendesak lebih lanjut diperlukan untuk tujuan mengklarifikasi temuan kami.
Studi lengkap tampaknya tidak disimpan di Internet Archive, tetapi dapat dibaca di sini.
Tanpa detail lebih lanjut dari Pracetak dengan staf Lancet yang menghapus makalah, sulit untuk mengetahui substansi apa yang sebenarnya dimiliki kesimpulan yang tidak didukung oleh metodologi. Sejumlah penulis makalah berada di puncak bidang mereka sehingga sulit untuk membayangkan bahwa metodologi tinjauan mereka benar-benar sangat buruk sehingga memerlukan penghapusan pada penyaringan awal daripada tunduk pada penilaian kritis penuh. Itu memukul alih-alih sensor mentah dari kertas yang gagal mengikuti garis resmi. Perlu diingat bahwa CDC belum mengakui satu pun kematian yang disebabkan oleh vaksin mRNA Covid. Bukti otopsi yang menunjukkan sebaliknya jelas bukan apa yang ingin didengar oleh lembaga kesehatan masyarakat AS.
Dr. Clare Craig, seorang ahli patologi dan ketua bersama kelompok penasihat pandemi HART, mengatakan bahwa dalam pandangannya pendekatan yang diambil dalam penelitian ini masuk akal. Dia mengatakan kepada Daily Sceptic:
Sistem VAERS [pelaporan kejadian buruk vaksin] dirancang untuk memperingatkan potensi bahaya tanpa harus menjadi cara terbaik untuk mengukur tingkat bahaya tersebut.
Mengkuantifikasi dampak kematian dapat dilakukan dengan melihat tingkat kematian secara keseluruhan di suatu negara.
Namun, ini tidak sempurna karena defisit kematian yang diharapkan setelah periode kematian berlebih, membuat keakuratan dasar apa pun meragukan.
Pendekatan alternatif untuk mengaudit kematian seperti itu melalui otopsi adalah suara.
Mungkin ada bias [dalam penelitian] terhadap pelaporan otopsi kematian di mana ada bukti sebab akibat dan kemungkinan sebab akibat mungkin dibesar-besarkan oleh bias itu. Sebagai contoh, 19 dari 325 kematian disebabkan oleh trombositopenia imun dan trombosis (VITT) yang diinduksi vaksin tetapi laporan ini mungkin terwakili secara berlebihan karena kesediaan regulator untuk mengakui kematian tersebut.
Namun demikian, penting bahwa upaya dilakukan untuk mengukur risiko bahaya dan sensor dari upaya ini, daripada kritik ilmiah terbuka, tidak membantu meyakinkan orang.
Dr. Harvey Risch, salah satu penulis penelitian, mengatakan kepada Daily Sceptic bahwa dia menganggapnya "sensor murni yang diarahkan Pemerintah, bahkan setelah Missouri v. Perintah Biden".
“Sementara itu, rekan-rekan saya sedang mempelajari apa yang mereka sebut 'Long Vax', yang merupakan kerusakan yang disebabkan oleh vaksin. Tapi tentu saja itu adalah hasil yang langka, langka, langka, kecuali bahwa mereka tampaknya tidak memiliki masalah menemukan orang-orang seperti itu untuk mendaftar dalam studi mereka," tambahnya.
Https://dailysceptic.org/2023/07/06/lancet-study-on-covid-vaccine-autopsies-finds-74-were-caused-by-vaccine-journal-removes-study-within-24-hours/
No comments:
Post a Comment