URANIUM ONE JUDGE TIED TO MUELLER "WET-WARE" SURVEILLANCE PATENT & THEFT OF SOCIAL NETWORKING
Theodore D. Chuang must recuse or be dismissed
Bookmark: #lionel-nation-thomas-paine | https://tinyurl.com/ybx427zd
You Will Be Completely Controlled — You Are "Wet-ware" — Implanted Devices & Mind Control Hijack You
Click image to play the video.
ORIGINAL POST
(Jan. 18, 2017)—Judge Theodore D. Chuang was just assigned by chief judge James K. Bredar to the first Uranium One indictment U.S. v. Lambert, 18-cr-00012 (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2018). Mark T. Lambert, the former president of a Maryland-based transportation company was indicted on 11 counts related to foreign bribery, fraud and money laundering.
Bredar disclosed DLA Piper LLP as one of his conflicts, and yet failed to mention that a predecessor to DLA Piper was Hill & Barlow LLP (Boston) where Robert Mueller was a partner along with a Chuang co-counsel with Ben T. Walker in defending Microsoft in a counterfeiting case managed by Chandler (who would eventually agree to be Leader Technologies' fated patent attorney). Bredar also worked a case with Rod Rosenstein where they imprisoned and deported at least nine individuals of Arab origin (US v. Doe, 564 F. Supp. 2d 480 (D. Md. 2008)) who had no legal counsel. Also notable, Bredar's confirmation hearing occured at the same time as the soon-to-be Leader v. Facebook replacement judge Leonard P. Stark. See Bredar Senate Confirmation Hearing (May 13, 2010) and Financial Report.
According to the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges Canon 2, federal judges must recuse themselves from presiding over cases where their involvement could be biased toward one party over the other. Canon 2 says that even the appearance impropriety dictates recusal.
In a federal district court office, the chief judge is the person who generally assigns judges to cases. On paper, the courts are required to maintain an ethics database to pre-screen for conflicts. These databases have been discovered to be incomplete or outright fraudulent.
Each judge is responsible to submit his or her conflicts to the database. So for example, if you represented Goldman Sachs before being appointed to the bench, Goldman Sachs must go on the list of companies for whom you cannot hear cases. However, if you hold a Vanguard Index Fund where Goldman Sachs is the largest single holding, you are ostensibly not required to disclose Goldman Sachs after Mar. 14, 2001 when the Judicial Conference approved what we call "The Great Mutual Fund Scam."
So, if a chief judge has been directed by his or her Deep State shadow government handlers to rule a certain way, he or she will choose a compliant judge to preside over that case.
Deep State criminals are pressing for plea bargains & Res Judicata
Judges have an often-abused privilege called "judicial discretion." This gives them great latitude over the conduct of a case, including summary judgments and motions to dismiss. Generally, given enough time, a group of unscupulous lawyers can concoct a way to convict a ham sandwich.
Once a judge absolves a criminal defendant of a crime in a motion to dismiss or summary judgment (pre-trial rulings), it is very difficult to overcome such a ruling under "Res Judicata." All you can do is appeal. However, if a corrupt judge is assigned to the appeal, the chances of seeing justice are nil. The U.S. Supreme Court takes very few appeals once you have lost your Circuit Court appeal.
Res Judicata means a person cannot be sued twice for the same matter. Therefore, the best way for the Deep State shadow government to be absolved of its crimes is to be tried in front of one of its many crony judges who will rule in their favor, and thus prevent a second trial on those counts.
In this Uranium One case, Judge Chuang was assigned by fellow Harvard Law grad chief judge James L. Breder. Judge Breder was appointed by Barack Obama on April 21, 2010.
Judge Theodore D. Chuang cannot possibly claim to be impartial in Uranium One
A joint Americans for Innovation and American Intelligence Media investigation has uncovered a nest of ties among parties implicated in Uranium One. These ties engulf Judge Chuang in a twisted knot of interrelationships that make it impossible for him to be impartial.
Social networking invention theft
In addition, Judge Chuang is tied to central actors in the theft of the social networking invention, most especially Harvard Law professor James P. Chandler, III. Chandler agreed to be Leader Technologies, Inc.’s patent attorney in 2000, then stole Leader's invention and shuffled it to the IBM Eclipse Foundation. Eclipse then distributed it to the federal government and military-industrial complex in Silicon Valley.
Monstrous cyborg “Internet of Things” total surveillance patent
Chuang was actually working at Robert Mueller’s former law firm Wilmer Hale LLP (formerly Hale & Dorr LLP) when Hewlett-Packard engineer Richard C. Walker (aka Rick Walker) filed for patents on global surveillance. Walker filed these patents in the name of a sham company named “Kline & Walker LLC” that he has hidden from the public in all of his biographies. See Meet The Person Who Can Remotely Crash Planes and Can Read Your Mind. (Note: Later we discovered that Kline & Walker's registered address is a house (not an office) that was walking distance to James P. Chandler's house in Potomac. Coincidence?)
See also previous post: AFI. (Jan. 11, 2018). Meet The Person Who Can Remotely Crash Planes And Can Your Mind. Americans for Innovation.
This patent is just unbelievable. It even describes embedded cyborg chips in people, which it calls “wet-ware.” These chips can control muscles, emit mind-altering frequencies, and put people to sleep or otherwise disable them or their vehicles, including aircraft. Mobile phones are also similarly wired, including emiting light and sound triggers.
Chuang’s Microsoft holdings demand his recusal
Robert Mueller and Bill Clinton have both been paid by Microsoft for speeches. Chuang and Ben T. Clements, Mueller’s law partner in Hill & Barlow LLP (Boston), actually represented Microsoft and the Justice Department in a criminal case advised by James P. Chandler, III.
On Apr. 27, 2009, Mueller actually delivered uranium samples to the Russians on instructions from the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Chuang’s Microsoft holding dictate his recusal given Microsoft’s intimate relationships with Mueller, the Clintons, James P. Chandler, III and Chuang’s co-counsel Ben T. Clements, Mueller’s partner in Hill & Barlow LLP.
What follows is the American Intelligence Media / Americans for Innovation investigation on Theodore D. Chuang.
Chuang holds stock in Microsoft and Cisco. SENATE TESTIMONY: p. 6:
Chuang’s US Attorney co-counsel in US v. Simons was Ben T. Clements.
This case shows that Chuang was taking instructions from Deep State shadow government lawyer James P. Chandler, III who was also advising Robert Mueller, Bill and Hillary Clinton, James B. Comey, Rod J. Rosenstein, James A. Baker. These individuals were deeply embedded in the FBI, NSA, CIA counterespionage operations.
Between 1990 and 1994, Ben T. Clements was a partner at Hill & Barlow LLP, Boston, according to his public biographies.
Between 2005-2010, Ben T. Clements was chief legal advisor to Gov. Patrick L. Duval.
Note that Duval is deeply connected to the D.C. criminal cabal as we outlined in our article entitled: Mueller’s Pathetic Attempt to Overthrow Trump and Prepare His 2020 Successor Fails Miserably
Between 1986-1994, Patrick L. Duval was a partner at Hill & Barlow LLP, according to his public biographies.
Between 1988-1989, Robert S. Mueller, III was a partner at Hill & Barlow LLP, according to his Senate testimony.
Hill & Barlow LLP was a boutique law firm. Therefore, the insider relationships among Clements, Duval, Chandler & Mueller are unmistakable.
Chuang’s collaboration with Clements re. an intellectual property case advised by Chandler, in turn associates him with Clements, Duval & Mueller.
Between 2004-2007, Chuang was counsel at Wilmer Hale LLP in Washington, D.C. Robert S. Mueller, III was a partner at Wilmer & Hale LLP
Chuang must be removed from the Uranium One case
* * *
Comment
Click "N comments:" on the line just below this instruction to comment on this post. Alternatively, send an email with your comment to amer4innov@gmail.com and we'll post it for you. We welcome and encourage anonymous comments, especially from whisteblowers.
No comments:
Post a Comment