"Breaking News" Pfizer is Liable for the Injury, Diseases and Deaths Caused by their mRNA Injections and They Need to Be Taken off the Market
My losses and scars were worth it. I fought against the false narrative that Pfizer has iron-clad immunity with everything I had. Champions of that false narrative are now saying Pfizer can be sued.
October 22, 2023: Steve Kirsch “broke the news” that Pfizer is liable for the injury, disease and death caused by their mRNA injections due to the relatively “recent discovery” that pDNA is in the vials with genetic sequences that cause cancers).
The cancerous genetic sequences are probably not just SV40 - I reported on pDNA and HeLA sequences on Oct. 20, 22021 on Brannon Howse and how they would change human DNA and cause a massive spike in very aggressive cancers with rapid tumor growth across all ages. (see article at end of this Substack).
This past Monday I explained on Blood Money with Vem Miller that I was ‘Lone Wolf’ by aggressively targeting Pfizer, called ‘Controlled Opposition’ and a ‘Russian Operative’ for fiercely championing my numerous med-legal analyses to take down Pfizer.
Blood Money with Vem Miller
34:35
Kingston: “Hindsight is 20/20. There is always better ways to approach things. I think the way I approached the entire movement…right, with again I’m used to being hired by board members of companies, so I am brought in to re-do the strategy. I made a mistake. I always said, ‘I don’t have an agenda.’ I did have an agenda. My agenda was targeting Pfizer and that was a mistake. That was a mistake because it was not accepted by the Freedom Movement.”
Vem Miller: “Wait, wait wait. So you’re saying that because you targeted Pfizer and you didn’t have back up by the Freedom Movement that was a mistake.”
Kingston: “Yes. That was a mistake. You can’t do things on your own, (I was) being a lone wolf. There’s safety in numbers. Being a lone wolf is foolish. It’s very foolish…I set up the med-legal review process for companies here in California. So there was a different weight to some of the documentation I brought forward and how I organized it.”
Kingston: “Lieutenant General Kirillov of the Russian Nuclear and Biowarfare protective programs, cites my work. So that (carries a lot of weight). And he encouraged, in September of 2022 or maybe December of 2022, he encouraged Europe, Asia, and Africa to break their contracts with Pfizer. And to separate Pfizer from the US government and to treat them as separate entities and that is what I’ve always recommended. And that was what was done. Pfizer put out a press release on Friday.”
I began organizing and presenting the evidence to prosecute Pfizer in 2021 in order to initiate charges against the Pharma giant. The evidence has remained consistent , so what changed?
I am excited that the Freedom Movement has gotten on board with the fact that Pfizer is criminally liable (Praise God! Finally!). However, when I was in Florida in July in of 2023, I was advised by many legal entities that the below document violated the Constitution and US laws. How So?
But what changed from when I took the stance in 2021 to prosecute Pfizer when I reported on Stew Peters on August 24, 2021 that the FDA broke Pfizer’s EUA immunity shield and that Pfizer was liable. (Others reported that the FDA approval had happened for BioNTech, not Pfizer and that the shield was not broken. This was a false and reckless reportin my opinion).
I was accused of being controlled opp, a lying grifter, or just plain ‘stupid’ for pointing out things like;
Pfizer can be sued for toxic contamination;
Pfizer can be be sued for their illegal initial new drug application, ignoring their ethical responsibilities as the IRB, and fraudulent clinical trials that were criminal in nature.
Pfizer can be sue because the FDA approval of Pfizer’s mRNA injections did happen shattering their EUA immunity shield because they were not protected by the US military.
So what changed the Medical Freedom Movement leader’s opinions?
Beginning in 2022, I was told by our leaders to get on board with the narrative that Pfizer is shielded under EUA and that they are untouchable… or else! Or else what? The answer was I would be sued or written out of the history of the COVID-19 battle (i.e. blacklisted from media and undergo character assassination….or worse).
I was even asked to apologize for correcting the insane claims made by some individuals that Pfizer’s clinical trials were ‘play theatre’ as part of a US military psyop and had iron-clad immunity, no matter how many innocent children and adults were disabled or died.
I understand that people make mistakes. I’ve made some mistakes and corrected them when they were pointed out. I am saddened that some influencers felt a need to attempt to discredit me, but am thankful that I did not capitulate to the false group narrative that Pfizer has iron-clad immunity (because even the champions of that false narrative are saying now Pfizer can be sued) and that I did not bend a knee to the father of lies out of fear of being disgraced, kicked out of the movement, or physically harmed. I’m proud of my scars and thankful for your prayers for God’s protection.
I’m Baffled? Should I Apologize for Standing Firmly in the Truth to Seek Justice And Who Do I Need to Apologize To and for What?
I’m baffled how scientific and government documents, investor presentations, FDA filings, patents, and the unprecedented increase in disease, disabilities and death in children and adults caused by the mRNA injections, along with other other real world evidence, was (according to our experts) meaningless in a court of law until today.
What Changed Their Minds?
On Monday, I sent this message to Warner Mendenhall, on the Brook Jackson Case.
What changed? How are the floodgates to sue Pfizer suddenly open? The laws and evidence that I presented to prosecute Pfizer have been available beginning 2 years ago and are being used in court rooms around the globe.
Please share your thoughts in the comments. Advice Welcome.
I Wouldn’t Have Gotten this Far Without You
If you would like to make a small donation by “buying me a cup of coffee” to continue to support me and my work, I greatly appreciate it. Donations help me now more than ever.
Your support allows me to provide top-notch biotech legal analysis. While my work is being used in the US and world-wide to seek justice, it’s the Kingston Report subscribers that keep the lights on. I can’t thank you enough. Original Article and Interview on pDNA and Cancer October 2021
July 22, 2023: Is Pfizer Liable for Contaminating COVID-19 mRNA Vials with Plasmid DNA?
In October of 2021, I reported that plasmid DNA (pDNA) is known ingredient in Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA injections per AGC Biologics’ June 7, 2021 press release announcing that AGC is the supplier of plasmid DNA (pDNA) for the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 ‘vaccines’.
It’s important to note that all of the substances in Pfizer’s mRNA vials have to be proven to be safe for human use per their DoD contract. If any of the ingredients cause significant harm, Pfizer is liable for the diseases and deaths caused by any chemicals, toxins, or other harmful substances contained in their COVID-19 mRNA vials.
Originally published April 14, 2023: Recent experts, most notably Kevin McKernan, have come forward confirming that plasmid DNA is in Pfizer’s mRNA vials and that plasmid DNA is for purposes of the expression on non-human DNA inside humans through cell transfection.
Transcript of Karen Kingston October 20, 2021 Report on Plasmid DNA in Pfizer mRNA ‘Vaccines’
“We were never told what was in these vials and that is criminal. And I just want to be clear that this does change your DNA.”
I first reported on the presence of plasmid DNA in Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vials on October 20, 2021 on Brannon Howse. I begin my presentation on pDNA at around 32:25.
This is a press release that was put out on June 7, 2021. AGC Biologics is one of the top manufacturers of biological agents and gene therapies, etc. in the industry.
This is a quote from their former Chief Business Officer. Mark has gone onto another organization. I’ll just read the press release.
“We are honored that BioNTech has entrusted us to become part of their global supply network in an effort to make the vaccine available to as many people as possible around the world,” says AGC Biologics Chief Business Officer, Mark Womack. “We are very proud of our efforts to provide our global customers with the essential materials needed to rapidly deliver vaccines in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.”
AGC Biologics will manufacture and supply BioNTech with the plasmid DNA starting material, an essential component of BioNTech’s mRNA-based vaccine manufacturing process.
Why is that alarming? Because nobody was told that they were injected with plasmid DNA!
“We were never told what was in these vials and that is criminal. And I just want to be clear that this does change your DNA. Why is that alarming? Because nobody was told that they were injected with plasmid DNA.” - Karen Kingston, October 20, 2021
What is Plasmid DNA?
Plasmid DNA is used for a number of applications including transfection - which is the insertion of genetic materials into your cells. Sequencing. Clones - we know what clones are - they’re clones. Restriction digestion - which is when you cut and paste DNA into different parts of a genetic sequence. And PCR is the polymerase chain reaction- so that is the mapping out a full DNA code and then taking what’s called a codon and copy pasting, copy pasting.
The main point of plasmid DNA is to help with integration of new genetic material into a (human) being. Just… that’s what it is.
Brannon: Say that last sentence again.
So the purpose of the plasmid DNA is to help with the integration of genetic material into a (human) being.
Brannon: And the question would be, “What genetic material?” Right?
Yeah. It (pDNA) can integrate viral genetic material. It can integrate genetic material from other species. It can integrate bacterial genetic material.
I mean, no one was told about this, and if you’re going to say to me ‘This doesn’t prove (the vials) contain plasmid DNA,’ then write the board of AGC Biologics and tell them that they’re lying Reuters.
Brannon: Is this the first time you presented this?
Yeah. You called me to talk about luciferase, so I put this together for you.
So I told you what transfection means, Thermo Fisher, this is their definition, “it’s the process of artificially introducing DNA and RNA into cells. It can result in changes to to the properties of the cell.”
This is a Genetic Change to Your Genetic Make-Up.
This is a genetic change to your genetic make-up.
“And Reuters! Go pound sand! If you say what I’m saying is false, send a letter to Thermo Fisher Scientific. Tell them to take down this definition.”
Brannon: Can result in the changes of the properties of the cell. So now these guys are injecting stuff into people to change the very make-up of their cell and their DNA?
Yes. So one of the make-up of the cells is you could have perfectly healthy cells that will now not go through natural cell death and have HeLa injected into them, so now you’ve got an aggressive cancerous cells that are forming tumors in your body. So that’s one change.
There could also be interspecies changes, but we don’t have time to go through that today.(end of transcript)
Is Pfizer Liable for Genetic Damage and Harm Caused by Plasmid DNA in their mRNA Vials?
Yes. Because due to Pfizer’s contract with the US Army, Pfizer is legally bound to the US laws regulating good manufacturing practices (GMP) for their FDA-approved mRNA ‘vaccines’ and good lab practices (GLP) for human clinical trials and emergency use authorized mRNA ‘vaccines’. This means that all of the substances in Pfizer’s mRNA vials have to be proven to be safe for human use. If any of the ingredients are not safe, Pfizer is liable for the injuries and deaths caused by any chemicals, toxins, or other harmful substances contained in their mRNA vials.
Under the Manufacturing Development Plan of Pfizer’s contract, it specifically states, “…the manufacturing process for the vaccine product to ensure conformity with 501(a)(2)(B) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (FD&C Act, Title 21 United States Code (USC) regarding good manufacturing practices (GMP).”
Per section 501(a)(2)(B) of the FD&C Act, a drug (or biologic) Pfizer must ensure that they follow good manufacturing practices to ensure that their mRNA injections meet the requirements of safety of any FDA-approved or authorized product for human use.
This means all substances in the vials must be safe for human use. The contract states that, “Pfizer shall scale up its capabilities for….manufacture, analysis, and release of GMP materials (mRNA).”
Analysis means that Pfizer will ensure quality control testing of the final product’s purity and consistency at the manufacturing facilities.
Several experts have proven that there are toxic levels of plasmid DNA, graphene oxide, and other substances harmful to humans found in the mRNA vials, as well as finding no mRNA itself in the vials. These findings are clear violations of Pfizer’s DOD contract and the laws that govern EUA and FDA-approved products.
Claiming Pfizer is NOT Subject to FDA Manufacturing or Safety Laws is Extrinsic Fraud
I am extremely confused as to why experts claim that Pfizer is not legally required to comply with current Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for their COVID-19 mRNA nanoparticle injections. Pfizer’s DoD contractclearly spells out that Pfizer must adhere to GMP and produce a safe and effective vaccine per 21 USC FDA regulated clinical trials.
Furthermore, in Pfizer’s April 22, 2022, motion to dismiss Brook Jackson’s whistleblower case, Pfizer clearly and factually states, “The FDA fully approved Pfizer’s vaccine by granting a Biologics License Application (BLA) on August 23, 2021. The vaccine is now marketed under the brand name ‘COMIRNATY’.”
The Federal Judge eventually dismissed the case, confirming that the FDA-approval happened and that the FDA was aware of the claims made by Brook Jackson, but did not perceive them to be of material significance that would have changed the FDA’s decision to approve COMIRNATY.
Claiming Pfizer’s clinical trials were ‘play theatre’ and that Pfizer is not legally contracted to adhere to Good Manufacturing Practices are false and reckless statements from a select few ‘experts’. If used in a court of law, this type of ‘expert testimony’ could quite literally enable Pfizer to get away with murder.
The Kingston Report. TRUTH WINS.
John 8: 42-45
‘For among My people are found wicked men. They lie in wait as one who sets snares.
They set a trap. They catch men. As a cage is full of birds, so their houses are full of deceit.
Therefore they have become great and grown rich.
Yes, they surpass the deeds of the wicked. They do not plead the cause, the cause of the fatherless. Yet they prosper and the right of the needy they do not defend.
Shall I not punish them for these things?’ says the Lord.
‘Shall I not avenge Myself on such a nation as this?’
Expertise and Intelligence is Required to Win an Intelligence War
I’ve been fighting this psychological war to educate Americans and our government officials for two years now. If you want America to take control of this biowarfare nightmare, please reach out to government leaders and powerful media influencers to request for me to present the evidence that can take down Pfizer and stop the mRNA technology platform dead in its tracks. I can be reached through patriots@mifight.com.
Keep up the good fight!
The Goodness Inside
People often ask me for advice on supplements and medical treatments. I can’t make medical recommendations for you, but for me, I know that reducing the level of acid in your body and taking a supplement that contains zeolite can help remove toxic metals from your body.
I use TouchStone Essentials Zeolite daily.
No comments:
Post a Comment