A Fierce battle between a Jew and a Catholic in the White House over Ukraine
The ideological divide between Blinken the Jew and Milley the Catholic was significant.
Become a VT Supporting Member Today
Please keep VT Radio and VT Foreign Policy alive! Donate today to make sure VT stays on the internet free and clear of Big Tech control! Donate today:Please Donate - Click Here
…by Jonas E. Alexis, VT Editor
Mark Milley, a retired United States Army general, served as the 20th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2023. His academic background is impeccable; he graduated from Princeton University and later earned a degree from Columbia University. In other words, he received exceptional training. However, academic excellence alone does not shield one from intense ideological battles, especially when confronting a persistent and destructive force that seeks to disrupt political stability, particularly in regions like Ukraine.
Antony Blinken is the 71st United States Secretary of State. He frequently references his family’s tragic experiences during the Holocaust. A graduate of Harvard University and Columbia University, Blinken also possesses an impressive academic background. To understand how big Jews like Blinken gained access to institutions such as Harvard, one might consider reading Nicholas Lemann’s The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy. So, academic credentials alone, as Daniel J. Flynn shows in Intellectual Morons, do not necessarily determine one’s adherence to truth.
The ideological divide between Blinken the Jew and Milley the Catholic was significant. Milley recognized that the Ukraine war could not continue indefinitely without severe consequences. He believed that President Zelensky needed to pursue peace to prevent Ukraine’s destruction.
Blinken, however, took a different stance. Despite the detrimental impact of the war on both Ukraine and the United States, Blinken advocated for Ukraine’s soldiers to continue their efforts, even in the face of mounting losses. In essence, Milley sought a peaceful resolution to end the conflict, while Blinken supported continued military engagement. In other words, death to the dumb Goyim.
At the heart of this issue lies a deeper ideological conflict. Milley seemed to prioritize a pragmatic approach aimed at preserving lives and stability, while Blinken’s perspective appeared driven by a different set of considerations, which critics argue contributed to prolonged suffering and destruction.
It is reported that Washington has spent nearly $100 billion on Ukraine, while challenges within the United States remain unaddressed. American cities are struggling, and recent events, such as a fire in Los Angeles that devastated the livelihoods of many, highlight the severity of these issues. Adding to the distress, reports emerged that “hundreds of L.A. landlords hiked rents to capitalize on ‘desperate’ fire evacuees,” exacerbating an already intolerable situation.
This raises a critical question: Can the United States afford to remain involved in protracted conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine? The burden falls not on the policymakers advocating for these wars but on average Americans, many of whom struggle to access basic needs such as affordable healthcare.
It is striking to note that countries like South Korea have more efficient healthcare systems than the United States, which is often touted as the “land of the free.” Two friends of mine who returned to the U.S. were shocked by the complexity and high costs of the healthcare system compared to other countries.
The broader question is whether the U.S. can sustain a system that appears to prioritize foreign interventions over domestic well-being. A reevaluation of priorities is urgently needed to address these imbalances and refocus on the needs of its citizens.
The first step in addressing this issue is to cease supporting individuals or nations that advocate for sending the United States and its resources into endless wars. We are already aware of the individuals who have been driving this agenda. Since Jews are the enemies of the entire human race, then they remain the key players behind any movement that seeks to overthrow the political order. That is why Blinken could not see the logic of seeking a peaceful solution on the Ukraine war. He is at war with the political order.
VT Condemns the ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINIANS by USA/Israel
$280+ BILLION US TAXPAYER DOLLARS INVESTED since 1948 in US/Israeli Ethnic Cleansing and Occupation Operation150B direct "aid" and $ 130B in "Offense" contracts
Source: Embassy of Israel, Washington, D.C. and US Department of State.
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.
No comments:
Post a Comment