Thursday 17 October 2024

 

Biden can’t say no to Israel, in spite of its flagrant violations of int’l law – Day 375

Palestinians search under piles of concrete for survivors and bodies after an Israeli attack on the Nassr neighbourhood of Gaza City on Wednesday (Dawoud Abo Alkas/Anadolu)

Compilation of news reports – IAK staff 

Israeli attacks killed at least 65 more Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, and injured 140, the Health Ministry in the enclave said on Wednesday.

A Lebanese ministry statement said that 27 people were killed and 185 others injured in Israeli attacks in the last 24 hours.

 RECOMMENDED READING: Shaaban Al-Dalou, Burned Alive in Gaza, Would Have Been 20 Today

How Israel’s Army Uses Palestinians as Human Shields in Gaza

New York Times reports:

An investigation by The New York Times found that Israeli soldiers and intelligence agents, throughout the war in Gaza, have regularly forced captured Palestinians like Mr. Shubeir to conduct life-threatening reconnaissance missions to avoid putting Israeli soldiers at risk on the battlefield.

While the extent and scale of such operations are unknown, the practice, illegal under both Israeli and international law, has been used by at least 11 squads in five cities in Gaza, often with the involvement of officers from Israeli intelligence agencies.

Palestinian detainees have been coerced to explore places in Gaza where the Israeli military believes that Hamas militants have prepared an ambush or a booby trap. The practice has gradually become more widespread since the start of the war last October.

Detainees have been forced to scout and film inside tunnel networks where soldiers believed fighters were still hiding. They have entered buildings rigged with mines to find hidden explosives. They have been told to pick up or move objects like generators and water tanks that Israeli soldiers feared concealed tunnel entrances or booby traps.

The Times interviewed seven Israeli soldiers who observed or participated in the practice and presented it as routine, commonplace and organized, conducted with considerable logistical support and the knowledge of superiors on the battlefield.

The Times also spoke to eight soldiers and officials briefed on the practice who all spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss a military secret. Maj. Gen. Tamir Hayman, a former chief of military intelligence who is routinely briefed by top military and defense officials on the conduct of the war, confirmed the use of one version of the practice.

And three Palestinians gave on-the-record accounts about being used as human shields…

(Read the full investigation here.)

ANADOLU AGENCY ADDS: State Department Matthew Miller told reporters that the report is “incredibly disturbing.”

“If the facts presented in that report are true, they’re completely unacceptable. There is no reason, there can be no justification ever for the use of civilians as human shields.”Miller said if the allegations are true, they would violate both international law and the Israeli army’s own code of conduct.

He said that it is “entirely appropriate” for Israelis to investigate the claims and called for accountability if the investigations confirm the violations.

According to EuroMed Human Rights Monitor, the Israeli army’s use of Palestinian civilians as human shields has been documented on a large scale
According to a report by EuroMed Human Rights Monitor, the Israeli army’s use of Palestinian civilians as human shields has been documented on a large scale. (EuroMed Monitor)

Israel’s destruction of northern Gaza continues

Anadolu Agency reports:

The Israeli army on Wednesday set Palestinian homes on fire in the area west of Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza, part of a prolonged ethnic cleansing operation that has persisted for 12 days amid the ongoing genocide since Oct.7, 2023.

Israeli forces advancing into the Be’er al-Na’ja area continued to burn residential buildings belonging to Palestinians, witnesses told Anadolu.

They reported that many homes and properties were engulfed in flames, resulting in substantial material losses, although no injuries were immediately reported.


News from the Lebanon front

At least six people were killed, including the mayor of Nabatieh Ahmad Kahil, and 43 were injured during heavy Israeli airstrikes that hit the municipality building of the southern Lebanese city on 16 October. Caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati described it as a deliberate strike against “a municipal council meeting focused on addressing the city’s relief and service needs.”

Israeli bombing leaves devastation in Lebanon’s Nabatieh. The strike targeted a local municipal building, with the town’s mayor among those killed.
Israeli bombing leaves devastation in Lebanon’s Nabatieh. The strike targeted a local municipal building, with the town’s mayor among those killed. (Jose Colon/Anadolu)

Also in Lebanon, an Israeli tank on Wednesday fired at the UN peacekeeping watchtower in a “direct and apparently deliberate” strike in southern Lebanon. in Kafr Kila of southern Lebanon, according to the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).

Two cameras were destroyed, and the tower was damaged, the peacekeeping force confirmed, describing it as a “direct and apparently deliberate” attack on the UNIFIL position.

The Lebanese Health Ministry said it was notified on Monday of a potential cholera case in the northern region of Akkar and verified the infection on Wednesday.

Israeli forces wiped out a historic southern Lebanese border village on Wednesday, the first operation of its kind, sparking outrage in the country.

Videos showed a series of massive explosions in Mhaibib, home to the 2,100-year-old shrine of Prophet Benjamin, were widely shared online, supposedly taken by Israeli soldiers from a distance.

Pillars of smoke filled the air amid the sounds of loud explosions, as Israeli soldiers were heard celebrating as the village was reduced to rubble, according to reports.

NOTE: Annexation of land – that is, the proclamation of sovereignty over the territory of another State – is a violation of international law.

Biden Deploys B-2 Stealth Bombers to Attack Yemen Without Congressional Approval

Common Dreams reports:

The Biden administration on Wednesday deployed B-2 stealth bombers to launch multiple airstrikes on Yemen, attacks that underscored the United States’ deep involvement in a deadly regional war that is threatening to engulf the entire Middle East.

CENTCOM said its assessment of the damage does not thus far “indicate civilian casualties.” The U.S. military has routinely refused to investigate, acknowledge, or apologize for killing civilians in Yemen and elsewhere in the world.

The Houthis have repeatedly attacked vessels in the Red Sea this year in what they say is an effort to stop Israel’s decimation of the Gaza Strip. The Biden administration has, in turn, bombed Yemen multiple times this year, strikes that progressive U.S. lawmakers have denounced as dangerous as well as illegal given that the White House did not seek congressional authorization, as required by the Constitution.

The strikes on one of the poorest nations in the world, Austin said, were “a unique demonstration of the United States’ ability to target facilities that our adversaries seek to keep out of reach, no matter how deeply buried underground, hardened, or fortified”—a message that observers interpreted as a warning to Iran.

AL JAZEERA ADDS: Yemen’s Houthis have promised to retaliate after the US conducted multiple strikes on weapons storage facilities in areas controlled by the group.

A Northrop Grumman B-2 aircraft in flight
A Northrop Grumman B-2 aircraft in flight (Wikimedia Commons)

Biden envoy: We will not hold back anything Israel wants

Politico reports:

The top U.S. official working on the humanitarian situation in Gaza told aid groups in August that the U.S. would not consider withholding weapons from Israel for blocking food and medicine from entering the enclave — a rare admission by someone in the administration.

At the Aug. 29 meeting in Washington, Lise Grande told the leaders of more than a dozen aid organizations that the U.S. could potentially consider other tactics to convince Israel to allow life-saving aid into Gaza — such as applying pressure through the United Nations, but stressed that the administration would continue to support Israel and would not delay or stop weapons shipments.

That account is based on conversations with three people in the meeting and two others who were briefed on it, along with a set of detailed notes from the encounter reviewed by POLITICO.

A humanitarian aid official who attended the meeting said Grande noted that Israel is one in a “tight circle of very few allies” that the U.S. will not oppose, nor will it “hold anything back that they want.”

While Grande’s statements were made more than a month ago, her candid assessment of the odds of the U.S. taking action on weapons for Israel raises questions about the seriousness of recent Biden administration threats to do just that.

On Sunday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin sent a letter to Israel in which they threatened to withhold weapons to Israel if it does not drastically improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza. The administration is giving Israel 30 days to correct course.


Number of Palestinian children in administrative detention quadrupled since last year

Defense for Children Int’l – Palestine reports:

The number of Palestinian children in administrative detention as of the end of September has nearly quadrupled since the same time last year.

Israeli forces are holding 85 Palestinian children in administrative detention as of September 30, representing 35 percent of all Palestinian children held in Israeli military detention, according to the latest information shared by the Israel Prison Service. This is a record number since Defense for Children International – Palestine began monitoring child administrative detainees in 2008.

“Israeli forces are arbitrarily detaining Palestinian children without charge or trial at a rate we have never seen before,” said Ayed Abu Eqtaish, accountability program director at DCIP. “Palestinian children held under administrative detention orders issued by Israeli military commanders have no idea when they will be released and reunite with their friends and family, which causes immense stress, anxiety, and depression for the children.”

Israeli forces were holding 23 Palestinian children in administrative detention as of September 30, 2023, representing 15 percent of all Palestinian children held in Israeli military detention at the time, according to data from the Israel Prison Service.

The number of child administrative detainees has rapidly climbed since October 7, 2023, when Israeli forces sharply escalated arrest operations throughout the occupied West Bank. Palestinian child detainees have consistently reported increased instances of ill-treatment and torture alongside deteriorating prison conditions since October 7, according to documentation collected by DCIP.

​​NOTE: Palestinian administrative detainees are prisoners held without charge, trial, or access to lawyers; administrative detention is intended to be used only in “exceptional” circumstances. Neither the administrative detainees, who include women and children, nor their lawyers are allowed to see the “secret evidence” that Israeli forces say form the basis for their arrests. Read more here.


These German politicians support Israeli genocide

The Cradle reports:

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on 16 October promised that Germany would “always” continue delivering arms to Israel for its war against Lebanon and the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.

“There are [weapons] deliveries and there will always be further deliveries. Israel can rely on that,” Scholz said in remarks to parliament.

“Israel can rely on our solidarity – now and in the future,” he stressed.

A German Foreign Ministry official has also said that the EU country sees “no sign of genocide” in Gaza – although earlier this year, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that it is “plausible” Israel violated the Genocide Convention during its brutal campaign in Gaza.

Last year, Germany approved arms exports to Israel worth $363.5 million, a 10-fold increase from 2022.

Addressing the German parliament, Germany’s Foreign Minister, Annalena Baerbock, justified Israel’s targeting of civilians in Gaza. ‘Self-defense means not only attacking terrorists* but destroying them. When Hamas terrorists hide behind people, behind schools… civilian places lose their protected status because terrorists abuse it.’

Human rights lawyer Craig Mokhiber explains that this assumption is false. The former senior UN human rights official told MEMO that Israel’s claim to a right to ‘self-defense’ in Gaza has no standing in international law. WATCH:

*NOTE: The use of the word “terrorist” for a group that resists occupation and oppression is a political, not fact-based choice. 
In reality, international law supports the efforts of resistance groups against an occupying power, the UN extending that right to the point of armed resistance
Hamas has clearly and openly stated that itsenemy is not the Jewish people, but the supremacist ideology of Zionism – the ideology under which Israel dispossessed750,000 Palestinian people and exiled them to Gaza and other locations. 


Israeli leaders to hold conference to encourage resettlement in Gaza: Report

Anadolu Agency reports:

Top leaders from Israel’s Likud Party, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, are set to hold a conference next week aimed at promoting the re-establishment of Israeli settlements in the Gaza Strip.

Despite Netanyahu’s previous dismissals of returning to Gaza settlements, key ministers, lawmakers, and prominent activists from the right-wing party are backing the initiative.

The event, scheduled for next Monday near the Gaza border, carries the slogan of the Likud Party along with the “Gaza is Ours, Forever” slogan and is centered on preparing for settlement efforts in the territory under the title of “Preparing to Resettle Gaza,” which Israel evacuated in 2005.

Among the key organizers is Social Equality Minister May Golan, along with numerous Likud lawmakers and activists.

The US has consistently opposed the idea of returning Israeli settlements to Gaza, a stance reiterated throughout the ongoing war, particularly after Israel dismantled its Gaza settlements nearly two decades ago.

NOTE: Annexation of land – that is, the proclamation of sovereignty over the territory of another State – is a violation of international law.


MORE NEWS:

IMEMC Daily Reports.
Human Rights Watch: Israel Should End Campaign to Destroy Lifesaving UN Palestinian Aid Agency
Mondoweiss: I resigned from Canada’s largest broadcasting corporation over its complicity in Israel’s genocide
Palestine Chronicle: ‘Lies’ – A Poem for Gaza and Palestine
+972 Magazine: The ‘pact of silence’ between Israelis and their media
Al Jazeera: West Bank villagers return to shattered Zanuta with keys but no homes

STATISTICS OCTOBER 7, 2023 – OCTOBER 16, 2024:

Palestinian death toll from October 7, 2023 – October 16, 2024: at least 43,192* ( 42,438 in Gaza* – 69% are women and children, according to Gaza’s Media Office). [The Ministry’s figures have been contested by the Israeli authorities, although they have been accepted as accurate by Israeli intelligence services, the UN, and WHO. These data are supported by independent analyses, comparing changes in the number of deaths of UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) staff with those reported by the Ministry, which found claims of data fabrication implausible.]

This is expected to be a significant undercount since thousands of those killed have yet to be identified – and at least 754 in the West Bank (~165 children). This does not include an estimated 10,000 more in Gaza still buried under rubble (4,900 women and children). Euro-Med Monitor reports 49,032 Palestinian deaths.

Lancet: “Applying a conservative estimate of four indirect deaths per one direct death to the 37,396 deaths reported, it is not implausible to estimate that up to 186,000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza.

Ralph Nader earlier estimated 300,000 Palestinians may have been killed in Gaza.

  • At least 45 Palestinians have died in Israeli prisons (27 from Gaza, 25 from West Bank).
  • At least 41 Palestinians have died due to malnutrition (at least 37 of them children)**.
  • About 1.9 million of Gaza’s 2.3 million population are currently displaced.
  • Almost 500,000 Gazans are currently experiencing catastrophic levels of food insecurity.

Palestinian injuries from October 7 – October 16, 2024: at least 105,446 (including at least 99,246 in Gaza and 6,200 in the West Bank, including 830 children). [It remains unknown how many Americans are among the casualties in Gaza.]

Reported Israeli death toll from October 7, 2023 – October 16, 2024: ~1,457 (~1,139 on October 7, 2023, of which ~32 were Americans, and ~36 were children); 297*** military forces since the ground invasion began in Gaza; 25 military and civilians in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Israel) and~10,000 injured.

The death toll in Lebanon since October 8, 2023 is at least 2,367 and 11,088 injuries. An estimated 1.34 million have been displaced.

NOTE: It is unknown at this time how many of the deaths and injuries of Israelis on October 7 were caused by Israeli soldiers.

*Previously, IAK did not include 471 Gazans killed in the Al Ahli hospital blast since the source of the projectile was being disputed. However, given that much evidence points to Israel as the culprit, Israel had previously bombed the hospital and has attacked many others, Israel is prohibiting outside experts from investigating the scene, and since the UN and other agencies are including the deaths from the attack in their cumulative totals, if Americans knew is now also doing so.

**Euro-Med Monitor reports that Gaza’s elderly are dying at an alarmingly high rate. The majority die at home and are buried either close to their residences or in makeshift graves dispersed across the Strip. There are currently more than 140 such cemeteries. Additionally, according to Euromed, thousands have died from starvation, malnourishment, and inadequate medical care; these are considered indirect victims as they were not registered in hospitals. 

***The figure does not include the reportedly 56 Israeli soldiers – nearly 16% of the total Israeli military deaths – killed due to friendly fire in Gaza and other military-related accidents. 

† For most of the conflict, women and children accounted for about 70% of deaths in Gaza, with children making up a little over 40% of those killed, according to official statistics.

Find previous daily casualty figures and daily news updates here.

Hover over each bar for exact numbers.
Source: IsraelPalestineTimeline.org

 

FLASHBACK 2014: U.S. Senators Are Nearly All Stooges for Israel

The Israel lobby was buying politicians and policy in 2014, and it is still doing so today. (Top of the list of recipients: Joe Biden.)

It is no coincidence that politicians on both sides of the aisle traditionally support Israel. They're on the payroll. (IAK)

by Michael S. Rozeff, reposted from LewRockwell.com, Jan. 14, 2014

There are 58 Senators who are now co-sponsors of the bill S. 1881: Nuclear Weapon Free Act of 2013. This bill makes war with Iran more likely and peace less likely. Its aim is to jettison the successful negotiations between the U.S. and Iran that have already occurred and make further progress less likely. This bill has war against Iran as its underlying aim.

AIPAC is a very prominent anti-Iran lobbying organization.

55 of the 58 Senators who are co-sponsors of this pro-war bill have received money from AIPAC totaling $7.3 million (2007-2012). 39 non-sponsors have received AIPAC money too, their total being $5.4 million. These amounts are drawn from a list of the top Senate recipients of AIPAC funds. The per-Senator average money is almost the same for the two groups. It’s $132,795 for the sponsors and $138,024 for the non-sponsors.

These distinctions are not that important, because we know that in 2012 the Senate voted 90-1 on an anti-Iran resolution and 94-0 to tighten sanctions. Nevertheless, it’s interesting to observe that the co-sponsor group, who tend to be the most vocal and hawkish and the most willing to promote war, is the group that has been paid the most money by AIPAC.

I’ve been writing articles against the U.S. policy on Iran for 7 or 8 years now. I have to admit that when the current administration began talking with Rouhani, I thought that this pretty much ended the threat of war. Never did I dream that the American warmongers, right and left, would meet these negotiations by attempting to pass new sanctions! Never did I dream that the neocons and Israeli interests had such influence in the U.S. Senate that they would seek to counter a peaceful foreign policy conducted by a sitting President.

The hand that they have chosen to play has surprised me, but that’s because I did not fully appreciate the perfidy of the neocon policies. Having seen them already in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, I should have known better than to think that reason and the interests of the American people might prevail for a change.

It is crystal clear at this point that we are looking at evil policies being promoted with unremitting vigor. We are looking at large numbers of traitorous Senators promoting very dangerous ideas that are expansionist and interventionist in nature.

They have built up a structure of lies, falsehoods, exaggerations, false enemies, false threats, impossible aspirations for dominance, and misperceptions.

We are looking at people who feign respectability, reasonableness, honesty, loyalty, and intelligence but who, when they promote war against a President who is succeeding in bringing a degree of peace, must be counted as among the lowest of the low, people that we must revile and reject as “leaders”, people that we must see as enemies of the interests of the peaceful pursuit of happiness.

These same people will, by and large, turn their guns against the American people and be most supportive of the national security state.

The following senators are Senate co-sponsors of this bill. Beside each name is the dollar amount of AIPAC contributions to that senator in the years 2007-2012.

[Following their 2007-2012 donations, find the career total for each of these senators, through 2024. The amounts are made available by OpenSecrets. Note that nearly every member of Congress has accepted contributions from the Israel lobby.]
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES JOE BIDEN HAS ACCEPTED $4,223,393 FROM THE PRO-ISRAEL LOBBY.

Mark Kirk 2007-2012 $925,379 (CAREER TOTAL $2,294,469)
John McCain 2007-2012 $771,012 (CAREER TOTAL $1,493,816)
Mitch McConnell 2007-2012 $430,925 (CAREER TOTAL $1,953,910)
Robert Menendez 2007-2012 $344,670 (CAREER TOTAL $2,501,847)
Kirsten Gillibrand 2007-2012 $326,937 (CAREER TOTAL $896,706)
Mary Landrieu 2007-2012 $296,409 (CAREER TOTAL $824,305)
Benjamin Cardin 2007-2012 $267,542 (CAREER TOTAL $913,285)
Charles Schumer 2007-2012 $248,149 (CAREER TOTAL $1,726,824)
Robert Casey 2007-2012 $192,550 (CAREER TOTAL $1,027,939)
Roger Wicker 2007-2012 $158,861 (CAREER TOTAL $705,014)
Mark Warner 2007-2012 $149,151 (CAREER TOTAL $359,611)
Susan Collins 2007-2012 $139,518 (CAREER TOTAL $647,758)
Mark Pryor 2007-2012 $138,250 (CAREER TOTAL $267,170)
John Thune 2007-2012 $123,725 (CAREER TOTAL $461,724)
Roy Blunt 2007-2012  $120,500 (CAREER TOTAL $408,778)
Joe Manchin 2007-2012 $117,110 (CAREER TOTAL $277,110)
Pat Roberts 2007-2012 $116,900 (CAREER TOTAL $305,700)
Bob Corker 2007-2012 $114,770 (CAREER TOTAL $168,083)
David Vitter 2007-2012 $112,619 (CAREER TOTAL $212,055)
Kelly Ayotte 2007-2012 $111,899 (CAREER TOTAL $522,014)
Michael Bennet 2007-2012 $109,126 (CAREER TOTAL $462,940)
John Cornyn 2007-2012 $107,000 (CAREER TOTAL $488,929)
Saxby Chambliss 2007-2012 $103,650 (CAREER TOTAL $145,400)
John Barrasso 2007-2012 $99,050 (CAREER TOTAL $241,189)
Orrin Hatch 2007-2012 $91,500 (CAREER TOTAL $203,383)
Jeff Sessions 2007-2012 $86,550 (CAREER TOTAL $215,450)
Marco Rubio 2007-2012 $86,200 (CAREER TOTAL $1,013,563)
Lisa Murkowski 2007-2012 $85,900 (CAREER TOTAL $436,022)
Lindsey Graham 2007-2012 $84,515 (CAREER TOTAL $1,000,580)
Daniel Coats 2007-2012 $82,733 (CAREER TOTAL $119,800)
Richard Blumenthal 2007-2012 $80,640 (CAREER TOTAL $389,981)
Joe Donnelly 2007-2012 $72,911 (CAREER TOTAL $142,183)
Dean Heller 2007-2012 $71,100 (CAREER TOTAL $203,992)
Richard Burr 2007-2012 $70,850 (CAREER TOTAL $234,336)
Robert Portman 2007-2012 $68,815 (CAREER TOTAL $326,046)
John Hoeven 2007-2012 $67,535 (CAREER TOTAL $334,296)
Mike Johanns 2007-2012 $63,635 (CAREER TOTAL $81,785)
James Inhofe 2007-2012 $60,000 (CAREER TOTAL $253,275)
Charles Grassley 2007-2012 $57,600 (CAREER TOTAL $502,541)
Jerry Moran 2007-2012 $53,400 (CAREER TOTAL $285,735)
Thomas Coburn 2007-2012 $47,445 (CAREER TOTAL $54,782)
Michael Crapo 2007-2012 $45,750 (CAREER TOTAL $327,673)
Mike Lee 2007-2012 $45,030 (CAREER TOTAL $368,778)
James Risch 2007-2012 $41,750 (CAREER TOTAL $255,787)
Patrick Toomey 2007-2012 $40,500 (CAREER TOTAL $330,245)
Ted Cruz 2007-2012 $39,354 (CAREER TOTAL $1,277,790)
Mark Begich 2007-2012 $36,727 (CAREER TOTAL $174,539)
John Boozman 2007-2012 $34,250 (CAREER TOTAL $309,860)
John Isakson 2007-2012 $31,600 (CAREER TOTAL $158,900)
Michael Enzi 2007-2012 $31,600 (CAREER TOTAL $121,825)
Richard Shelby 2007-2012 $27,250 (CAREER TOTAL $274,215)
Deb Fischer 2007-2012 $26,400 (CAREER TOTAL $474,580)
Chris Coons 2007-2012 $20,774 (CAREER TOTAL $258,166)
Tim Scott 2007-2012 $15,310 (CAREER TOTAL $378,896)
Ron Johnson 2007-2012 $10,400 (CAREER TOTAL $347,043)


RELATED READING:

 

End of the United Nations? BRICS Decision Shocked the World

Countries from the BRICS alliance and the Global South are pushing for major reforms at the United Nations, arguing it's overly dominated by Western Nations U.S., the U.K., France, Russia, and China

Mainstreaming EXIT UN With BRICS?

The globalization structure is fracturing… Just so you all know! There is the issue of BRICS exiting the DOLLAR with their own system to compete with SWIFT. Let’s face it, times they are changing, BRICS is leading the way to destabilizing the dollar and EXITING UN. This will cause enormous shifts in economies and legal structures.

Below let’s discuss the BRICS pathway out of UN. What does this mean for world currency? What if BRICS really bailed on UN? 

New World Order is here - BUT the question is, who will control it?

Share

Is It Time to Move On From UN? 

Reforming the UN is a Waste and the World Needs a Better System

In recent years, the BRICS alliance—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—along with nations from the Global South, have increasingly voiced frustration with the United Nations (UN). They argue that this outdated institution, especially its Security Council, is not just failing to serve their interests but is fundamentally flawed, dominated by Western nations who cling to power and push questionable agendas. As these calls for reform grow louder, a more pressing question arises: Is the UN even worth saving, or is it time to abandon this relic and build something better?

A Club for the Powerful Few & You And I Ain’t In It

The UN was founded in the aftermath of World War II with lofty ideals of fostering global cooperation, but over time, it has become a platform dominated by a few powerful nations. The Security Council, with its five permanent members—the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China—has absolute veto power, effectively locking the world into a system where these nations decide what’s important and what isn’t.

For BRICS countries like Brazil, India, and South Africa, the structure of the UN symbolizes an entrenched imbalance of power. Despite representing large populations and growing economies, these nations remain shut out from permanent representation on the Council. Meanwhile, African nations, which make up 28% of UN membership, are also without a permanent seat, leading many to question whether the organization can ever reflect the modern world. But after decades of failed reform efforts, should they even bother anymore?

Why Reform Won’t Work—And Isn’t Worth It

For years, calls for reform have fallen on deaf ears. The BRICS countries have repeatedly demanded changes to make the UN more inclusive, especially in the Security Council, but the Western powers have no incentive to dilute their control. And why would they? The current system allows them to push through their own agendas, often under the guise of global cooperation, while stifling the voices of developing nations.

In reality, the UN has become a bureaucratic mess that is more interested in maintaining the status quo than making any real changes. Reforming this institution would require a massive overhaul that the existing power players would never allow. Even if some superficial reforms were enacted, it’s unlikely they would address the deeper structural issues that perpetuate Western dominance.

Instead of wasting time and resources on reform, why not simply abandon the UN and start fresh? The world doesn’t need another rehash of failed policies and empty promises. What it needs is a new system, one that doesn’t just benefit the few but is designed from the ground up to serve the interests of all nations, without the baggage of a post-World War II institution that’s out of touch with today’s realities.

UN’s Climate Commitments: Another Layer of Waste and Fraud 

One of the UN’s most glaring failures is in the area of climate change, where it has been pushing costly and unrealistic commitments that disproportionately affect developing nations. Under the guise of "saving the planet," the UN and its Western backers have promoted climate policies that many argue are more about control than actual environmental protection.

Developing countries are often forced to comply with these climate commitments, even when it hampers their economic growth and development. The BRICS nations and others in the Global South, who are still trying to lift millions out of poverty, are expected to play along with rules written by Western nations who already industrialized and polluted the planet for over a century.

At the same time, the UN's climate change framework has been rife with inconsistencies, questionable science, and outright fraud. UN claims “we own the science” and partnered with Google to put UN climate “science” first! The alarmist narrative often pushed by Western countries has been met with increasing skepticism. Instead of genuinely addressing environmental concerns, it’s more about pushing global control agendas through mechanisms like ubiquitous censorship of truth that climate always changes, carbon credits, green taxes, and international regulations that disproportionately burden developing nations while enriching Western corporations.

This isn’t just bad policy—it’s a waste of resources. BRICS countries have more pressing concerns, from economic development to infrastructure, and they shouldn’t have to bend to an international framework built on shaky foundations.

Time for a New Global Order—Without the UN - We are PLACING OUR ORDERS For A New World Order Ran By Us!

If anything, the UN’s failure to reform is proof that it’s beyond saving. It’s time to acknowledge the truth: this system is broken. Rather than continuing to play a losing game, countries should be focusing on building something better, outside the shadow of the UN and their plan for a New World Order. We agree there must be order from this chaos, but UN caused the chaos to benefit and countries are waking up to put their own houses in order and create the future they want to see.

The BRICS nations have already started laying the groundwork for this new global order out of UN’s chaos. The establishment of the New Development Bank (NDB) in 2014, which serves as an alternative to the Western-dominated World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), is a clear signal that BRICS countries are ready to take control of their own futures. The NDB finances infrastructure and sustainable development projects in emerging economies without forcing countries into the same restrictive terms that Western financial institutions impose. Unlike the dollar-dominated IMF and World Bank, the NDB allows for loans in local currencies, helping nations reduce dependency on the dollar.

This is just the beginning. The potential for BRICS and other emerging powers to create alternative structures for global governance is vast. By working together, these nations can form new institutions that serve the interests of developing economies without the baggage of outdated Western-driven agendas. The UN isn’t needed in this new world. If anything, it’s a hindrance.

Let the UN Fade Away

The UN’s shortcomings aren’t just an inconvenience—they’re proof that the organization is obsolete. For far too long, the world has operated within the confines of a system designed to benefit a handful of powerful nations, all while pushing questionable policies like climate change commitments that do more harm than good.

Rather than continuing to throw money and resources at a failed system, it’s time to let the UN fade into irrelevance. Reforming it is not just a waste of time, it’s a distraction from what really needs to happen: building new institutions that better reflect today’s world. The power structures, policies, and priorities that emerged from a post-World War II reality no longer serve us, and it’s time to move on.

The rise of BRICS and other emerging powers offers an opportunity to break free from the outdated frameworks that have stifled progress for so long. By abandoning the UN and its fraudulent agendas, countries can focus on what really matters—economic growth, sovereignty, and development—without the interference of a bloated, ineffective bureaucracy.

The world doesn’t need more reform; it needs a revolution in how we govern and cooperate internationally. And that revolution starts by leaving the UN behind, once and for all.


Two good videos on BRICS exit of UN:

Share

If you want to make a huge difference in the state of the world, please consider a contribution or monthly contributions to our Nov 11 hearing against WHO - It is the first granted hearing in the world with jurisdiction over WHO, to settle the PCR and vax disputes with IoJ - It is 100% really possible to stop the shots and PCR globally in this hearing with the VP & Health Minister of Costa Rica by them using their top powers to nullify the WHO DG EUL Authorizations that allowed it on the global market! 

We still need a LOT more help to ensure the Attorney’s fees are paid to get our awesome Attorneys to represent us and Dr. Yeadon, etc. 

All help, right now, when it matters most, is the greatest Karma in the world! 

We will make you proud and have such a good chance to actually win to take these products off the market, but we still really need a lot more help to pay down the remaining legal bills!

Contribute

Leave a comment

  • If you want US to EXIT UN: sign the 2 Bills on preventgenocide2030.org

  Biden can’t say no to Israel, in spite of its flagrant violations of int’l law – Day 375 contact@ifamericansknew.org   October 17, 2024 ad...